Need to develop the theory of architecture
این نوشته تلاشی است برای تشریح ضرورت تدوین مبانی طراحی معماری و با این طرز فکر نگاشته شده است که معماری میبایست بر اساس اصولی پایهریزی شود که بتوان آنها را مورد آزمایش دقیق علمی و تجربی قرار داد.
در حال حاضر کتابی برای راهنمایی معمار جوان و مشتاق وجود ندارد که توضیح دهد چگونه میتوان یک محیط مناسب برای فعالیتهای انسان طرحریزی نمود و آن را به مرحله اجرا درآورد. همچنین راهنمای واضح و روشنی برای طراحی موجود نیست که بر مبنای ایدههایی پایهریزی شده باشد که راه را برای تحقیق و بازبینی باز بگذارند. در عوض دانش معماری در اذهان معماران ورزیده و آکادمیهای معماری پنهان و مستور است.با توجه به آنچه گفته شد، در فضای کنونی جهان معماری نیاز مبرمی به تدوین دانش علمی معماری با کیفیات یاد شده احساس میشود تا بار دیگر معماری، گذشته درخشان خود را بازیابد. ما نیز ابزارهایی در اختیار داریم که با بهرهگیری از آنها میتوان برای ساختن یک محیط جدید همت گماشت و بزرگترین موفقیتهای معماریهای گذشته را تکرار نمود. مردم نیز میتوانند یکبار دیگر معماری را به عنوان یک عنصر مطلوب تجربه کنند، بجای آن که معماری ماشینی برای ایجاد اضطراب و افسردگی در آنها باشد.
This post is an attempt to describe the need for architectural design and development principles with the idea that architecture is written must be founded on the principles that they can be tested experimentally made precise and scientific.
Now a book for young and aspiring architect tips there that explain how a suitable environment for human activities can be planned and implemented into it. Also, a clear guide for the design is not based on ideas that are the basis for research and review ways to put back. Instead architectural knowledge in the minds of experienced architects and architectural academy is hidden and covered.
The cause of this shortage is that education is a long time architecture based training system in schools and architecture firms are looking for. This shows that the medieval guild system, at least for architects, foot still exist. A research scientist in this style of training is anachronistic and even dangerous, because the closed system of knowledge versus scientific method is open to corruption, deviation and leads to dogmatic thinking. A moment to think about how to do a scientific case accepts. Work processes are the person who announces the results of research and then his colleagues are up to their effort to reject its findings must. This means that the result they obtained, is sophisticated. By others as well as their ability to examine and assess placed. When an outcome was assessed independently by other researchers, then this result proved in the body of scientific knowledge is placed, at least until a more accurate result more general, or not replace it.
Unlike the processes mentioned above, such architecture does not work. Architectural education in the twentieth century from its long science has isolated and instead leave open investigation, a set of dogmatic beliefs about the design offers never evaluated are not. Brjamandh knowledge of the traditional architecture with modern ideas of conflict, without any sense of regret to the Trash is on deposit. Not only the architecture community lacks strong theoretical body, but also traces of what is called architectural theory, it also does not exist.
Considering what was said, in the current atmosphere of world architecture urgent need to develop scientific knowledge architecture circumstantiality mentioned to be felt again in architecture regain its brilliant past. We have also provided tools that they can be benefiting from a new environment to make the greatest efforts of duty and architectural past successes can be repeated. People can also once again as an architectural element to the desired experience, rather than a machine architecture that create anxiety and depression in them.